Post by dav1d on Jan 29, 2018 14:12:35 GMT
26°20'11.31" S 79°52'39.23" W
Island 900 kms west of Chile coast - whats ....kmz (740 B)
Robinson Crusoe Island is listed as a private island available to rent. I guess that means no trespassers.
It has extensive obfuscation at various places. A couple of the largest are here: Overlay.kmz (696 B)and here: looks like an opening like a large tunnel.kmz (732 B) This type of obfuscation is everywhere.
It may be put forward that the owner does not wish to show their home and has requested that Google photoshop the image, but so many blatant and precisely covered sites is a bit beyond such a thought. Note that the obfuscation, or 'photoshopping', occurs on all sides of the island.
It may be suggested that these are US bases, but the availability to rent the island knocks that out of the park. At least it seems to me anyway.
Oddly enough some images of the island via an image search are also given the same treatment, although one:
www.worldatlas.com/r/w728-h425-c728x425/upload/d7/9d/a0/shutterstock-265908083.jpg has a dark silvery grey disk pretty much dead centre in the image.
In the following image from the annoying Alamy website (they seem to be scooping many images up and watermarking them and then charging for them (this includes publicly available NASA images)) the dark silvery disk has been recoloured to match the surrounding environs:
c8.alamy.com/comp/FY6PRB/robinson-crusoe-island-chile-FY6PRB.jpg
Or maybe the worldatlas people coloured there's to be silver? Nah!
This alteration seems typical of the processing done to some of the very few images available of this island. Even the first image linked above looks to me to have been altered. Note the smearing of brown soil, the lack of detail in the surface of the mountain etc. etc. I'll let the viewer scan about. Note focussed and unfocussed land. Note mistiness that seems to cover clear imagery at different places.
One of the most interesting thing about this image (the link above via Alamy):
Download or open the Alamy image and look above the 'm' in Alamy that runs along the bottom left of the image as in 'Alamy stock photo'. Now you should also see three watermarked 'a's, for the pesky Alamy, that form a triangle above the words 'Alamy stock photo'?
Draw an imaginary line up from the 'm' (actually above the centre of the second hump of the letter 'm') in this Alamy stock photo, and then draw another imaginary line between the two 'a's that form the bottom of this triangle of 'a's above the 'Alamy stock photo' words. Just left of the vertical line, at the intersection of these two imaginary lines, you might see what looks like a ghostly image of Shrek's head (of course it isn't) floating above the image. If you find it, zoom in so it fills your screen and stand back a few metres.
This is the most distinct and clear image I've seen of a spiritual being ... and there are other examples on this island and in many other places, but they are very hard to see. And very hard to process mentally.
Note that the shutterstock image cuts across the forehead of 'shrek' and is a bit more dithered. Comparison between the differences in these two 'identical' images is worthwhile. I'm sure viewers will see things that I do. It seems someone has seen some things in this image and obfuscated them, and others have seen other things and done the same, but some miss what the other sees. Lucky for us!
This next image is from a lower angle than the Alamy and Worldatlas images (linked above).
www.vladi-private-islands.de/fileadmin/_processed_/0/1/csm_isla_robinson_crusoe_014_67bfa3088c.jpg
A close inspection of the top of the mountain where the other images have the disk, shows something like an underside glimpse of it. Were both photos (Alamy Worldatlas image and this one) taken at the same time? Probably won't ever find out.
Note the pine trees in the 'vladi-private' image? Now look at the pines in this image:
i.pinimg.com/736x/1e/37/ff/1e37ff79bc6f8f2b74e202e21b34afdf--robinson-crusoe-chile.jpg
Is it me, or is there a difference in the picture concerning the pines? I'm inclined to think that in one image we have a right angle of pines, and in the other, just the row that runs parallel to the shore. I think we are looking at something that I'd rather not put into words for now.
Note the interesting pattern on the vertical cliff that occupies the right hand side of the image, the one that looks like a profile of 'shrek'? This too, looks to have been dithered. You might see a far more terrifying face at about 2 o'clock towards the edge of the mountain. Green obscures part of it.
Of additional interest is the way half of Robinson Crusoe Island has been overexposed, and the white spotted 'terrain'. It doesn't look at all cloud like. Definitely rotate the images and view from a distance and up close.
Pay careful attention to the shadows. Some have no reason for existing. See for example: Shadow example.kmz (701 B)
This link should be rotated so that 'up' is SE and hence N is at about 7.30 on a clock. I won't suggest what I imagine I see, I'll leave that up to the viewer and happy to engage in postulation. The height of the shadows should be zoomed in until it takes up about 50% of the height of your monitor. Place it in the centre. There are other similar examples on both land and sea.
Here's an ocean image to try: Wave.kmz (709 B)View with north up. You will see an almost circular froth. At a distance of about 1km it looks like a person with their arm extended towards where 1.30 would be on a clock. Now look to the right of this interesting formation and note the radial lines. There doesn't appear to be any reason for waves to be curved like that. The bay is not curved. There is a focal point to these though, a very bright spot: focal point of radial waves.kmz (725 B).
With only a very small amount of imagination, it looks like a disk coming up from the sea. Particularly if the bright spot is taken to be a part of the radial lined image.
Now go here: Two people standing.kmz (718 B), just below the odd wave froth (as shown in Wave.kmz)
It looks like two people standing (hence the clever kmz title) just forward of what appear as jagged white squares. One of the people seems like a male in a dark outfit and the other a female, on his right, in a whitish pantsuit. View from about 570m and zoom in slowly. It can take about 120m before the image is lost in pixels and whatnot.
Multiple circular shapes. Eg.: This is tricky, as if the rest of this post hasn't been! See May be 4 disks.kmz (714 B) Viewed from about 700m with north up, you will see two white parallel lines in or under the green patch of sea. To the left of this at about 10 on the clock from the two white parallel lines, and viewed at the same distance, you may see a round shape with round dark off-set centre. Zoom into about 300m. Look at the shape at 2 o'clock from the round white shape with the off-set dark centre. It has a dark almost triangular top. Study this for a bit. It can stand zooming in to about 150m. You might also try filling your monitor with it and standing a fair way back.
You will see also an almost horizontal straight white 'line' that fattens slightly at its centre and partially covered at the centre by a dark and semi-circular shape (which is itself of interest). There is also a rectangular shape that is forward of the white circular feature the dark off-set centre, and looks to be under the second shape (with the scalene triangle of dark at its top).
A couple more: Multiple circular shapes with dark centres located here: More disks.kmz (714 B) North up. Note that the island at this point looks like hands raised above your head and brought together. If you go here, you might make out a face under those arms: Face.kmz (707 B) To the left of the face, the ocean is particularly interesting. Zoom in and out.
The neighbouring Alexander Selkirk Island, which is predominantly a runway, has fewer examples of 'photoshopping', but they are there, along with other things that a close look will reward.
There's lots more but I've probably exceeded my quota.
Shadows and sun angles are important.
Have fun looking. If you don't see what I see, I can cope.
God bless us all.
David
Island 900 kms west of Chile coast - whats ....kmz (740 B)
Robinson Crusoe Island is listed as a private island available to rent. I guess that means no trespassers.
It has extensive obfuscation at various places. A couple of the largest are here: Overlay.kmz (696 B)and here: looks like an opening like a large tunnel.kmz (732 B) This type of obfuscation is everywhere.
It may be put forward that the owner does not wish to show their home and has requested that Google photoshop the image, but so many blatant and precisely covered sites is a bit beyond such a thought. Note that the obfuscation, or 'photoshopping', occurs on all sides of the island.
It may be suggested that these are US bases, but the availability to rent the island knocks that out of the park. At least it seems to me anyway.
Oddly enough some images of the island via an image search are also given the same treatment, although one:
www.worldatlas.com/r/w728-h425-c728x425/upload/d7/9d/a0/shutterstock-265908083.jpg has a dark silvery grey disk pretty much dead centre in the image.
In the following image from the annoying Alamy website (they seem to be scooping many images up and watermarking them and then charging for them (this includes publicly available NASA images)) the dark silvery disk has been recoloured to match the surrounding environs:
c8.alamy.com/comp/FY6PRB/robinson-crusoe-island-chile-FY6PRB.jpg
Or maybe the worldatlas people coloured there's to be silver? Nah!
This alteration seems typical of the processing done to some of the very few images available of this island. Even the first image linked above looks to me to have been altered. Note the smearing of brown soil, the lack of detail in the surface of the mountain etc. etc. I'll let the viewer scan about. Note focussed and unfocussed land. Note mistiness that seems to cover clear imagery at different places.
One of the most interesting thing about this image (the link above via Alamy):
Download or open the Alamy image and look above the 'm' in Alamy that runs along the bottom left of the image as in 'Alamy stock photo'. Now you should also see three watermarked 'a's, for the pesky Alamy, that form a triangle above the words 'Alamy stock photo'?
Draw an imaginary line up from the 'm' (actually above the centre of the second hump of the letter 'm') in this Alamy stock photo, and then draw another imaginary line between the two 'a's that form the bottom of this triangle of 'a's above the 'Alamy stock photo' words. Just left of the vertical line, at the intersection of these two imaginary lines, you might see what looks like a ghostly image of Shrek's head (of course it isn't) floating above the image. If you find it, zoom in so it fills your screen and stand back a few metres.
This is the most distinct and clear image I've seen of a spiritual being ... and there are other examples on this island and in many other places, but they are very hard to see. And very hard to process mentally.
Note that the shutterstock image cuts across the forehead of 'shrek' and is a bit more dithered. Comparison between the differences in these two 'identical' images is worthwhile. I'm sure viewers will see things that I do. It seems someone has seen some things in this image and obfuscated them, and others have seen other things and done the same, but some miss what the other sees. Lucky for us!
This next image is from a lower angle than the Alamy and Worldatlas images (linked above).
www.vladi-private-islands.de/fileadmin/_processed_/0/1/csm_isla_robinson_crusoe_014_67bfa3088c.jpg
A close inspection of the top of the mountain where the other images have the disk, shows something like an underside glimpse of it. Were both photos (Alamy Worldatlas image and this one) taken at the same time? Probably won't ever find out.
Note the pine trees in the 'vladi-private' image? Now look at the pines in this image:
i.pinimg.com/736x/1e/37/ff/1e37ff79bc6f8f2b74e202e21b34afdf--robinson-crusoe-chile.jpg
Is it me, or is there a difference in the picture concerning the pines? I'm inclined to think that in one image we have a right angle of pines, and in the other, just the row that runs parallel to the shore. I think we are looking at something that I'd rather not put into words for now.
Note the interesting pattern on the vertical cliff that occupies the right hand side of the image, the one that looks like a profile of 'shrek'? This too, looks to have been dithered. You might see a far more terrifying face at about 2 o'clock towards the edge of the mountain. Green obscures part of it.
Of additional interest is the way half of Robinson Crusoe Island has been overexposed, and the white spotted 'terrain'. It doesn't look at all cloud like. Definitely rotate the images and view from a distance and up close.
Pay careful attention to the shadows. Some have no reason for existing. See for example: Shadow example.kmz (701 B)
This link should be rotated so that 'up' is SE and hence N is at about 7.30 on a clock. I won't suggest what I imagine I see, I'll leave that up to the viewer and happy to engage in postulation. The height of the shadows should be zoomed in until it takes up about 50% of the height of your monitor. Place it in the centre. There are other similar examples on both land and sea.
Here's an ocean image to try: Wave.kmz (709 B)View with north up. You will see an almost circular froth. At a distance of about 1km it looks like a person with their arm extended towards where 1.30 would be on a clock. Now look to the right of this interesting formation and note the radial lines. There doesn't appear to be any reason for waves to be curved like that. The bay is not curved. There is a focal point to these though, a very bright spot: focal point of radial waves.kmz (725 B).
With only a very small amount of imagination, it looks like a disk coming up from the sea. Particularly if the bright spot is taken to be a part of the radial lined image.
Now go here: Two people standing.kmz (718 B), just below the odd wave froth (as shown in Wave.kmz)
It looks like two people standing (hence the clever kmz title) just forward of what appear as jagged white squares. One of the people seems like a male in a dark outfit and the other a female, on his right, in a whitish pantsuit. View from about 570m and zoom in slowly. It can take about 120m before the image is lost in pixels and whatnot.
Multiple circular shapes. Eg.: This is tricky, as if the rest of this post hasn't been! See May be 4 disks.kmz (714 B) Viewed from about 700m with north up, you will see two white parallel lines in or under the green patch of sea. To the left of this at about 10 on the clock from the two white parallel lines, and viewed at the same distance, you may see a round shape with round dark off-set centre. Zoom into about 300m. Look at the shape at 2 o'clock from the round white shape with the off-set dark centre. It has a dark almost triangular top. Study this for a bit. It can stand zooming in to about 150m. You might also try filling your monitor with it and standing a fair way back.
You will see also an almost horizontal straight white 'line' that fattens slightly at its centre and partially covered at the centre by a dark and semi-circular shape (which is itself of interest). There is also a rectangular shape that is forward of the white circular feature the dark off-set centre, and looks to be under the second shape (with the scalene triangle of dark at its top).
A couple more: Multiple circular shapes with dark centres located here: More disks.kmz (714 B) North up. Note that the island at this point looks like hands raised above your head and brought together. If you go here, you might make out a face under those arms: Face.kmz (707 B) To the left of the face, the ocean is particularly interesting. Zoom in and out.
The neighbouring Alexander Selkirk Island, which is predominantly a runway, has fewer examples of 'photoshopping', but they are there, along with other things that a close look will reward.
There's lots more but I've probably exceeded my quota.
Shadows and sun angles are important.
Have fun looking. If you don't see what I see, I can cope.
God bless us all.
David
