Stonehenge Geometry clarified

Am still getting acquainted with the Forum, so please excuse lack formalism... Thanks

Stonehenge Geometry clarified.kmz (9.12 KB)

Stonehenge Golden Ratios relationship appear when considering 1 unit = 100 meter.(or ϕ = 161,8 metres).
Mounts B1, B2 and B3 are respectively distant 626,3, 700 and 755,7 metres from Stonehenge centre and result in various triangles with the intersections of vertical (Sout-North bound) and horizontal (East-West bound) in S1 (happens to be a path)
These triangle have Areas of exact proportions such as 2 Pi, 5 and 14 square units.(to 0,1% error)
The mounts are seen as rings from upper distance and also bear interesting Pi-Meter relationships.
These relationships can also be found, expresion of a mathematical signature, also found in other locations such as Durrington Wall, or Lundy Island, Carnac, Baalbek, Kheops, and many others in Americas extending worldwide, thus establishing a network of significant geometrical meaning.
The golden ratio math is quite simple and straightforward once understood, and relies on the assumption and axiom whereby 6Phi²/5=Pi

Present relationships have deep consequences and are thourougly demonstrated in detail and constructible with rule and compass, leading to many other conclusions such as squaring of the circle.

The geometry is however not exact since the axiom is erroneous, but the resulting precison is greater than the pencil thickness or means of measurements dating back 4.500 years back.

[filelink type="pdf" href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/13Dqsy-FeY9Rq-Zg_6kW60FL0bbZNza-h/view?usp=sharing"](Complete development, in French) Stonehenge - Construction[/filelink]

May 13, 2016 15:10:23 GMT filsdabeille said:

Stonehenge Golden Ratios relationship appear when considering 1 unit = 100 meter.(or ϕ = 161,8 metres).
Mounts B1, B2 and B3 are respectively distant 626,3, 700 and 755,7 metres from Stonehenge centre and result in various triangles with the intersections of vertical (Sout-North bound) and horizontal (East-West bound) in S1 (happens to be a path)
These triangle have Areas of exact proportions such as 2 Pi, 5 and 14 square units.(to 0,1% error)
The mounts are seen as rings from upper distance and also bear interesting Pi-Meter relationships.
These relationships can also be found, expresion of a mathematical signature, also found in other locations such as Durrington Wall, or Lundy Island, Carnac, Baalbek, Kheops, and many others in Americas extending worldwide, thus establishing a network of significant geometrical meaning.
The golden ratio math is quite simple and straightforward once understood, and relies on the assumption and axiom whereby 6Phi²/5=Pi

Present relationships have deep consequences and are thourougly demonstrated in detail and constructible with rule and compass, leading to many other conclusions such as squaring of the circle.
The geometry is however not exact since the axiom is erroneous, but the resulting precison is greater than the pencil thickness or means of measurements dating back 4.500 years back.

Hi, and welcome to the community   


In this community its a tradition to use placemarks / kmz file(s) instead of screenshots and or written coordinates.


Please educate yourself with this tutorial
>> Very basic placemarks and post help <<

Thank you.

Thanks for the tip

Not sure if the subject is posted at the right place... Would you have any suggestion ?

May 13, 2016 19:33:53 GMT filsdabeille said:

Thanks for the tip

Not sure if the subject is posted at the right place... Would you have any suggestion ?

Your file you uploaded to this community is in pdf, not kmz.

This community doesn't use any other file, except kmz. Please edit your attachment,
since the file you uploaded goes to a pdf document rather than to Google Earth as a
kmz / placemark.

May 13, 2016 19:43:50 GMT ET_Explorer said:

May 13, 2016 19:33:53 GMT filsdabeille said:

Thanks for the tip

Not sure if the subject is posted at the right place... Would you have any suggestion ?

Your file you uploaded to this community is in pdf, not kmz.

This community doesn't use any other file, except kmz. Please edit your attachment,
since the file you uploaded goes to a pdf document rather than to Google Earth as a
kmz / placemark.

I did post a kmz file but its at the bottom .. here's another one..

Attachments:

Stonehenge Geometry clarified.kmz (9.12 KB)

May 14, 2016 9:41:39 GMT filsdabeille said:

May 13, 2016 19:43:50 GMT ET_Explorer said:

Your file you uploaded to this community is in pdf, not kmz.

This community doesn't use any other file, except kmz. Please edit your attachment,
since the file you uploaded goes to a pdf document rather than to Google Earth as a
kmz / placemark.

I did post a kmz file but its at the bottom .. here's another one..

This one is the same as the first, why do you need to add another one, this is just a duplicate. 

ET, I don't see a duplicate, filsdabeille has done what you asked and provided a kml file. Please try and be more friendly in your replies, sometime you seem a little hostile to new members.
Cheers mate.

I have now found, after refreshing cookies, that ET was correct. It is a newbie mistake, so no real problem. Many thanks to you both.

In addition to yesterday's stuff, I'd like to complement with another of many pieces of a puzzle (it extends worldwide, but each relationship needs to be assimilated to get the whole picture).

In this case we have an horizontal line (East-West) of 100 km distance between a site I call Stonehenge proximity and Beacon Hill (Weacombe reserve).

There's room formore precision..

There is some marginal error, but it is part of a greater scheme whereby the amount of error is negligible (1km over 100 km is not the same as 1 km over 400)
The ultimate reason to my point is showing that behind these reliques dating several thousand years there is a message, a most important one, and only super super platform such as Google Earth could highlight the objects awaiting so long to be contemplated.

I can anticipate alarming objections ahead, such as "this is not as place where one shares his opinions, but one where Google Earth directly points to interesting items". This is well the case, the locations are objective, measurable and almost unquestionable. I will also point out that language is very imperfect, nobody speaks English correctly, yet there is large acceptance for error since the message is basically understood. Its the same for present case, no need to point out there are errors before seeing the whole picture... Its a question of essence, the form only the shell.

Looking at the scheme, one can intuitively extend another 100 km to the left and coincide with Lundy Island. On the other hand, from Beacon hill 386 km downwards (0,3% error 100 x Square root of 15), you might find a place in the middle of a river bed (the place used to be 40 meters higher several thousand years ago) in a surrounding called Berringue le Loc'h (Loc'h is derived from Celtic language obviously meaning Lake).

When these points established, then the full geometric significance of the various sites established.

Comments are welcomed...

Attachments:

Exmoor Nat. Park uncharted Rings.kmz (8.69 KB)

Stonehenge Beacon Hill 100 km proximity.kmz (1.47 KB)

D Berringue Le Loch.kmz (843 B)

May 15, 2016 15:58:18 GMT filsdabeille said:

May 14, 2016 17:09:37 GMT filsdabeille said:

In addition to yesterday's stuff, I'd like to complement with another of many pieces of a puzzle (it extends worldwide, but each relationship needs to be assimilated to get the whole picture).

In this case we have an horizontal line (East-West) of 100 km distance between a site I call Stonehenge proximity and Beacon Hill (Weacombe reserve).

There's room formore precision..

There is some marginal error, but it is part of a greater scheme whereby the amount of error is negligible (1km over 100 km is not the same as 1 km over 400)
The ultimate reason to my point is showing that behind these reliques dating several thousand years there is a message, a most important one, and only super super platform such as Google Earth could highlight the objects awaiting so long to be contemplated.

I can anticipate alarming objections ahead, such as "this is not as place where one shares his opinions, but one where Google Earth directly points to interesting items". This is well the case, the locations are objective, measurable and almost unquestionable. I will also point out that language is very imperfect, nobody speaks English correctly, yet there is large acceptance for error since the message is basically understood. Its the same for present case, no need to point out there are errors before seeing the whole picture... Its a question of essence, the form only the shell.

Looking at the scheme, one can intuitively extend another 100 km to the left and coincide with Lundy Island. On the other hand, from Beacon hill 386 km downwards (0,3% error 100 x Square root of 15), you might find a place in the middle of a river bed (the place used to be 40 meters higher several thousand years ago) in a surrounding called Berringue le Loc'h (Loc'h is derived from Celtic language obviously meaning Lake).

When these points established, then the full geometric significance of the various sites established.

Comments are welcomed...

Attachments:

Lundy-Stonehenge-Berring Triangle.kmz (13.08 KB)