New Black Project aircraft ?

Historical Imagery 7/30/2005      3 Objects.kmz (861 B)

Why do you suspect that these three objects have some connection with Black Project Aircraft?

Do you have any information (Website Links) that backs your story?

To me, they could be anything?

What story might you be referring to, ET? All I can see here is a question about imagery, which sure the hell does not require links, evidence or validating information to ask.
Being that I am viewing this on my phone, I do not have access to historical imagery, so at this time I cannot offer much insight on the inquiry, however I can say with certainty that this has nothing to do with aviation or black projects in any form.

Jul 23, 2015 0:36:03 GMT ET_Explorer said:

To me, they could be anything?

Wow.They could be anything? You mean like this fuzzy blob you posted? Or this fuzzy blob? Just because you have been careful not to make any specific claims in the dozen or so posts you've done around Dulce and Archuleta Mesa, you don't fool me. I know exactly why. You just don't want to have to defend claims.

I see your posts as being no different than this one, and it's hypocritical (in my opinion) to criticize this one. Hotwheelz just has the guts to say what he really believes.

What, pray tell, are Black Projects? I could look it up, but this is an example where the poster's responsibility includes crucial links. That's a necessary part of being an active member here, if you want to be taken seriously.  Another point is that the mods and many members have been looking at GEC posts for as many as 10 years. (I've been here 8.) We've seen every conceivable "suspicious fuzzy blob" post and have long since ceased to be interested in them - as well as anything posted about Area 51, Roswell or conspiracy theories. We've seen them all.

So, whether you've been around for a few years or just got here, please keep the above in mind when you're tempted to do another of the these kinds of posts. There are probably a thousand other forums online where they would be fodder for much serious discussion.

Jul 24, 2015 1:03:09 GMT diane9247 said:

There are probably a thousand other forums online where they would be fodder for much serious discussion.

Exactly! Let's keep it real. Literally.

The area is a part of the White Sands Missile Range. If you look at historical imagery over time starting at some time prior to 2005 you can see that the area is "groomed" by scraping or harrowing the ground. This is probably to help in finding remains of off course rockets being tested and destroyed in flight. 2005 is the first evidence we can see of this scraping and the piles may simply be debris piles. In no way do they look like any kind of aircraft. 

Feel free to post your various theories here, that is why this forum exists.  But don't expect to be unchallenged, or perhaps ignored.

Often though posts such as yours will be ignored because experienced viewers of aerial imagery won't bother. If you are looking for a positive reaction, post sightings like this to YouTube with lots of dramatic music, zooming in and out, and narrations in stentorian tones.

They look like craters to me.  Maybe shell or rocket test explosions, hence the lining up.

Jul 31, 2015 20:55:21 GMT @carl2 said:

They look like craters to me.  Maybe shell or rocket test explosions, hence the lining up.

Judging by the sun angle of buildings at 32° 35.757'N 106° 21.057'W, NE of the 3 objects, they are positive "topography" like piles of debris rather than negative like craters.