Junior Member
May 2018 - Feb 6, 2021 21:20:10 GMT
|
Post by raineduske on Jun 28, 2018 16:53:12 GMT
|
|
Master Gamer
April 2018 - Mar 27, 2024 20:32:20 GMT
|
Post by willi1 on Jun 28, 2018 17:30:40 GMT
What do you think about the second link where it takes you to the X diagram? For die Placemark pX ? See above in my last post.
|
|
Master Gamer
April 2018 - Mar 27, 2024 20:32:20 GMT
|
Post by willi1 on Jun 28, 2018 18:31:25 GMT
...and what about wall type structures as in: Following: 1. harb Hard to say. Could be a digitization problem. Or a huge wall hook
2. harb2 For me clearly sonar ship traces 3. -280 poi Overlay of real photos and digitized terrain model with a bad strip (overlay problem). Press the timeslider, then it will be clear. The pimples in the digital part on the left are funny, I interpret here as a digital error. Whether the water depth is correct there? You can see the real seabed as a foto. At more than 20 meters, he should no longer be visible.
|
|
Master Gamer
April 2018 - Mar 27, 2024 20:32:20 GMT
|
Post by willi1 on Jun 28, 2018 19:02:32 GMT
Here something for which I find no explanation first. A long head with many ears. Or the genie is out of the bottle. Probably a pareidolia through the seabed.
At underwater view and 3x elevation one recognizes a valley with elevations. So geological terrain.
Attachments:Long head.kmz (702 B)
|
|
Junior Member
May 2018 - Feb 6, 2021 21:20:10 GMT
|
Post by raineduske on Jul 3, 2018 2:05:54 GMT
Ok Willie, I totally get there can be glitches, and there can be structures that are not valid (ones you can go through and they don't ground-level out). Do you think that none of the markers are valid? Are there some makers that strike you to be valid? if so, what are the ones that interest you? You can contact me directly if you like. I have added 4 more locations here. Please, browns the description of each. Lock wall 1 of 23 in the canal.kmz (724 B) LP3.kmz (844 B) p.kmz (771 B) p1.kmz (765 B) Cheers,
|
|
Master Gamer
April 2018 - Mar 27, 2024 20:32:20 GMT
|
Post by willi1 on Jul 3, 2018 20:35:28 GMT
I'll sign up for answer your post tomorrow. My English is not very good. What do you mean by "browns the description"?
Meanwhile take a look at this area:
And, I've make a tour on the seafloor there. Amazing! Look the Tour-KMZ! Explanation follows tomorrow
Attachments:Pattern.kmz (692 B)
Tour Pattern.kmz (11.2 KB)
|
|
Junior Member
May 2018 - Feb 6, 2021 21:20:10 GMT
|
Post by raineduske on Jul 4, 2018 17:30:57 GMT
Lolll... sorry Willi, it is I that does not speak very good English. I meant to write brows (look over).
|
|
Master Gamer
April 2018 - Mar 27, 2024 20:32:20 GMT
|
Post by willi1 on Jul 4, 2018 20:03:31 GMT
I meant to write brows (look over). Alright. Browns was a typo. So I do not need a paintbox or UV light. Now to the Placemarks. Lock wall 1 --- Probably category artifact. The edge is vector graphics and too sharp for a real object.
LP3 --- The previously discussed sonar traces of ships have usually very different depth values as the computer generated ocean floor. Therefore, they appear more accurate than the model, as "valleys" or "elevations". At the ends and sides of these tracks, wall-like structures often appear. "Accurate" is relative. There are still resolutions of only 100x100 m per pixel. (The best resolutions are, for example, Hawaii, there are 50x50 m) P --- Corresponds to your placemark pX.kmz (post of June 27, I have discussed in my post of June 28). Possible further explanation also see below under "Pattern". P1 --- The end of a sonar track (see LP3), the spikes are the usual guys, nothing special.
Now to the "Pattern" shown yesterday. What seems like a huge shark's mouth is nothing more than single depth measurement (for example, with echosounder, no side-scan sonar). In a certain grid, the depth has been determined punctiformly south of Guam. And that deviates from the GE model. Now comes the joke: GE takes there both records and superimposed them. The different measurement points areI think because she have used a similar knife driving. now displayed as peaks and we already have this beautiful surrealist seabed that is so not exist. To the east of it looks like a riveted sheet metal. And the data in GE superimposed.
GE gets its seabed data from various sources (SIO, NOAA, US Navy, NGA, GEBCO, etc.). If one now shows two or more records superimposed, happens (I ask for forgiveness) - Bullshit. And with it our underwater anomalies. So long willi1
|
|