Crazy stuff found when the black square on Sky was removed.

Oct 9, 2015 17:37:00 GMT anythingcrazy said:

I was able to find "Planet X". CRAZY RIGHT?! Everyone else saw it too, but check out what's to the left on it. Some weird anomaly...
                                 




AnythingCrazy

Hi, Welcome to Google Earth Community Forums   

It would be best that you create a placemark so others can see your finds, rather than using screenshots.


Creating Placemarks

Oct 9, 2015 17:37:00 GMT anythingcrazy said:

I was able to find "Planet X". CRAZY RIGHT?! Everyone else saw it too, but check out what's to the left on it. Some weird anomaly...
                                 

Check it out yourself...




AnythingCrazy

Your placemark (Planet X) is according to SIMBAD is known as 

2MASS J05422123+2236471 -- T Tau-type Star


SIMBAD

Oct 9, 2015 17:37:00 GMT anythingcrazy said:

I was able to find "Planet X". CRAZY RIGHT?!

Right. That is crazy. The laws of physics prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is no unknown planet that can be seen in Google Sky. There is no "Planet X" in our solar system. If there was it would be wreaking havoc on the other planets orbits. I own 3 telescopes and have observed every planet with my own eyes. They are all right where they are supposed to be, therefore: no planet x.

Oct 9, 2015 17:37:00 GMT anythingcrazy said:

Everyone else saw it too

This assertion is perplexing. Who is "everyone else"? Everyone on YouTube? Everyone on some woowoo website? Certainly no one in the astronomy community has seen Planet X.

Another claim I find perplexing is in the title: "when the black square on Sky was removed". Nothing has changed in Google Sky since it's inception. The "black square" is still there. It's just missing imagery. No cover-up, no conspiracy. The original imagery has always been available from other sources.

Now let's talk about what you really did find, which I think is rather interesting. It is a star like ET said, but what about those "wings"? Are they real? Yes they are! I looked at several images from the original Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS) and the nebulosity is visible going back to 1951.





The first image is from 1951. The second image is from 1991. Since it didn't move for 40 years it is a star, not a planet. And since the "wings" can be seen is both images, they are something real: in this case it is a reflection nebula. (Simply put, space dust is lit up by a very hot star.) This one is identified as GN 05.39.2.

As for the "weird anamoly" you found, this too is easily explained. It's a poorly resolved internal telescope reflection. Here is a slightly better image:




I created a video explaining this type of artifact back in 2012 (yes, the same year that Planet X failed to destroy the Earth as predicted by thousands of YouTube videos).



I hope that clears it up for you. Welcome to the GEC.

P.S. Here's the bank spot.

Attachments:

Blank Spot in Sky.kmz (695 B)

Oct 9, 2015 21:54:59 GMT Gregg1956 said:

Oct 9, 2015 17:37:00 GMT anythingcrazy said:

I was able to find "Planet X". CRAZY RIGHT?!

Right. That is crazy. The laws of physics prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is no unknown planet that can be seen in Google Sky. There is no "Planet X" in our solar system. If there was it would be wreaking havoc on the other planets orbits. I own 3 telescopes and have observed every planet with my own eyes. They are all right where they are supposed to be, therefore: no planet x.

That's absolutely wrong! Planet X is NOT in the solar system. What are you talking about? It is true to it's name, "unknown planet".

"Who is "everyone else"? Everyone on YouTube? Everyone on some woowoo website? Certainly no one in the astronomy community has seen Planet X."

That is also wrong. Even scientists today and back in 17th - 20th century knew there was some kind of "gravitational body" beyond Neptune. They calculated this because moons on Neptune and Uranus were experiencing "gravitational tremors" that would "wobble" the moons. It is not in the solar system, it's a outside body. And I'm not a pseudoscientist, or a end - time freak. I like this kind of astrophysics and astronomy.


I don't know what kind of telescope you have...
 

Oct 9, 2015 17:37:00 GMT anythingcrazy said:

Everyone else saw it too

This assertion is perplexing. Who is "everyone else"? Everyone on YouTube? Everyone on some woowoo website? Certainly no one in the astronomy community has seen Planet X.

Another claim I find perplexing is in the title: "when the black square on Sky was removed". Nothing has changed in Google Sky since it's inception. The "black square" is still there. It's just missing imagery. No cover-up, no conspiracy. The original imagery has always been available from other sources.

Now let's talk about what you really did find, which I think is rather interesting. It is a star like ET said, but what about those "wings"? Are they real? Yes they are! I looked at several images from the original Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS) and the nebulosity is visible going back to 1951.





The first image is from 1951. The second image is from 1991. Since it didn't move for 40 years it is a star, not a planet. And since the "wings" can be seen is both images, they are something real: in this case it is a reflection nebula. (Simply put, space dust is lit up by a very hot star.) This one is identified as GN 05.39.2.

As for the "weird anamoly" you found, this too is easily explained. It's a poorly resolved internal telescope reflection. Here is a slightly better image:




I created a video explaining this type of artifact back in 2012 (yes, the same year that Planet X failed to destroy the Earth as predicted by thousands of YouTube videos).



I hope that clears it up for you. Welcome to the GEC.

P.S. Here's the bank spot.

Oct 10, 2015 1:08:25 GMT anythingcrazy said:

Even scientists today and back in 17th - 20th century knew there was some kind of "gravitational body" beyond Neptune. They calculated this because moons on Neptune and Uranus were experiencing "gravitational tremors" that would "wobble" the moons. It is not in the solar system, it's a outside body. And I'm not a pseudoscientist, or a end - time freak. I like this kind of astrophysics and astronomy.



I don't know what kind of telescope you have...

Maybe you like astrophysics and astronomy but you are about a century behind the rest of us. Percival Lowell was searching for Planet X about a hundred years ago. Literally. What scientists know today is that nothing is unaccounted for as far as gravitational perturbation goes.

Lowell's greatest contribution to planetary studies came during the last decade of his life, which he devoted to the search for Planet X, a hypothetical planet beyond Neptune. Lowell believed that the planets Uranus and Neptune were displaced from their predicted positions by the gravity of the unseen Planet X. 
...

However, it would subsequently emerge that the Planet X theory was mistaken.

Pluto's mass could not be determined until 1978, when its satellite Charon was discovered. This confirmed what had been increasingly suspected: Pluto's gravitational influence on Uranus and Neptune is negligible, certainly not nearly enough to account for the discrepancies in their orbits.
...

In addition, it is now known that the discrepancies between the predicted and observed positions of Uranus and Neptune were not caused by the gravity of an unknown planet. Rather, they were due to an erroneous value for the mass of Neptune. Voyager 2's 1989 encounter with Neptune yielded a more precise value of its mass, and the discrepancies disappear when using this value. [source]

Another fact that you are obviously unaware of is that planets outside of our solar system could not possibly be visible in Google Sky! 

If you really like astronomy you should quit making erroneous and unsupported claims and spend the time doing research instead. By research I don't mean listening to some ignoramus who claims that the blank spot in G Sky has been revealed and now shows Planet X. Give me a freakin' break. No... give me some evidence.

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan

EDIT: what does it matter what kind of telescope I have? (My avatar shows my best one. Anyone who knows telescopes knows what that is.)

Oct 10, 2015 2:56:44 GMT Gregg1956 said:

OMG I am SO sorry!


My brother got on my account. I don't know how. I'm very sorry for the trouble he caused you.

WTH is planet x btw...

You and your brother seem to have the same problem with the quote feature. You're quoting me as saying something said by you.

Oct 10, 2015 19:00:35 GMT anythingcrazy said:

Oct 10, 2015 2:56:44 GMT Gregg1956 said:

OMG I am SO sorry!


My brother got on my account. I don't know how. I'm very sorry for the trouble he caused you.

WTH is planet x btw...



So you are saying that there are two of you in this community with same username?!?

Oct 10, 2015 19:14:47 GMT Gregg1956 said:

You and your brother seem to have the same problem with the quote feature. You're quoting me as saying something said by you.

Yeah please help me with that. He doesn't know how to either i guess.

Oct 10, 2015 19:33:27 GMT ET_Explorer said:

Oct 10, 2015 19:00:35 GMT anythingcrazy said:

No he got my password and username somehow. I have a paper with them both on and he took it. I'm going to create a file in word that is password protected.